<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
> <channel><title>Comments for un|we|sen</title> <atom:link href="http://www.unwesen.de/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.unwesen.de</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>Comment on Android Jittery Scrolling Gallery by Morten Slott Hansen</title><link>http://www.unwesen.de/2011/04/17/android-jittery-scrolling-gallery/comment-page-1/#comment-2482</link> <dc:creator>Morten Slott Hansen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:41:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.unwesen.de/?p=1916#comment-2482</guid> <description>I still had some jitter issues with this solution. My solution was similar to yours - but only override onLayout.
@Override
protected void onLayout(boolean changed, int l, int t, int r, int b) {
int viewsOnScreen = getLastVisiblePosition() - getFirstVisiblePosition();
if(viewsOnScreen &lt;= 0)
super.onLayout(changed, l, t, r, b);
}</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still had some jitter issues with this solution. My solution was similar to yours &#8211; but only override onLayout.</p><p> @Override<br
/> protected void onLayout(boolean changed, int l, int t, int r, int b) {<br
/> int viewsOnScreen = getLastVisiblePosition() &#8211; getFirstVisiblePosition();<br
/> if(viewsOnScreen &lt;= 0)<br
/> super.onLayout(changed, l, t, r, b);</p><p>}</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Android Intent Sender Verification by unwesen</title><link>http://www.unwesen.de/2011/04/10/android-intent-sender-verification/comment-page-1/#comment-2481</link> <dc:creator>unwesen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.unwesen.de/?p=1900#comment-2481</guid> <description>Sure, but that works only if you control the certificate for both apps. The whole point of intents is to engender cross-vendor cooperation in apps, though. In that scenario, signature protection is useless.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, but that works only if you control the certificate for both apps. The whole point of intents is to engender cross-vendor cooperation in apps, though. In that scenario, signature protection is useless.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Android Intent Sender Verification by Kacper Nazwisko</title><link>http://www.unwesen.de/2011/04/10/android-intent-sender-verification/comment-page-1/#comment-2480</link> <dc:creator>Kacper Nazwisko</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.unwesen.de/?p=1900#comment-2480</guid> <description>If your applications are signed with the same certificate, you can use permission with:
android:protectionLevel= &quot;signature&quot;  
Then, only apps with the same certificate can communicate with a receiver.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your applications are signed with the same certificate, you can use permission with:</p><p>android:protectionLevel= &#8221;signature&#8221;  </p><p>Then, only apps with the same certificate can communicate with a receiver.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Encryption on Android &amp; BouncyCastle by unwesen</title><link>http://www.unwesen.de/2011/06/12/encryption-on-android-bouncycastle/comment-page-1/#comment-2479</link> <dc:creator>unwesen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.unwesen.de/?p=1953#comment-2479</guid> <description>Thanks!
No, it&#039;s not a silly question at all - but I&#039;m afraid I can&#039;t provide the answer. I don&#039;t use Eclipse; I always feel it gets in my way of trying to just get things done. Consequently I can&#039;t help with Eclipse.
The XML snippet belongs in build.xml; what I don&#039;t know is how Eclipse treats that file. Worst case would be that it tries to (re-)generate it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p><p>No, it&#8217;s not a silly question at all &#8211; but I&#8217;m afraid I can&#8217;t provide the answer. I don&#8217;t use Eclipse; I always feel it gets in my way of trying to just get things done. Consequently I can&#8217;t help with Eclipse.</p><p>The XML snippet belongs in build.xml; what I don&#8217;t know is how Eclipse treats that file. Worst case would be that it tries to (re-)generate it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Encryption on Android &amp; BouncyCastle by Sylvain</title><link>http://www.unwesen.de/2011/06/12/encryption-on-android-bouncycastle/comment-page-1/#comment-2478</link> <dc:creator>Sylvain</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:42:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.unwesen.de/?p=1953#comment-2478</guid> <description>Nice post, thank you.
Anyway, I&#039;m still wondering where in Eclipse to write the &quot;
...&quot; part...Sorry if it is a silly question!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, thank you.</p><p>Anyway, I&#8217;m still wondering where in Eclipse to write the &#8221;<br
/> &#8230;&#8221; part&#8230;Sorry if it is a silly question!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Android Development: Database Upgrades by unwesen</title><link>http://www.unwesen.de/2009/09/07/android-development-database-upgrades/comment-page-1/#comment-2477</link> <dc:creator>unwesen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.unwesen.de/?p=336#comment-2477</guid> <description>More importantly, you can test whether your upgrade actions are idempotent. That&#039;s a rather useful trait for development, as well as production.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More importantly, you can test whether your upgrade actions are idempotent. That&#8217;s a rather useful trait for development, as well as production.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Android Development: Database Upgrades by Bob Kerns</title><link>http://www.unwesen.de/2009/09/07/android-development-database-upgrades/comment-page-1/#comment-2476</link> <dc:creator>Bob Kerns</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.unwesen.de/?p=336#comment-2476</guid> <description>It&#039;s always good to have alternatives!
I like the idea of copying, because then you&#039;re in a known state. Not every upgrade action can be properly tested by just resetting the version number.
But for a quick test, your approach has the advantage.  It certainly beats bumping the version number up and up!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s always good to have alternatives!</p><p>I like the idea of copying, because then you&#8217;re in a known state. Not every upgrade action can be properly tested by just resetting the version number.</p><p>But for a quick test, your approach has the advantage.  It certainly beats bumping the version number up and up!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Android Jittery Scrolling Gallery by unwesen</title><link>http://www.unwesen.de/2011/04/17/android-jittery-scrolling-gallery/comment-page-1/#comment-2475</link> <dc:creator>unwesen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.unwesen.de/?p=1916#comment-2475</guid> <description>Thanks! I&#039;m glad it works for you! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! I&#8217;m glad it works for you!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Android Jittery Scrolling Gallery by Anthony</title><link>http://www.unwesen.de/2011/04/17/android-jittery-scrolling-gallery/comment-page-1/#comment-2474</link> <dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:29:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.unwesen.de/?p=1916#comment-2474</guid> <description>Ingenious solution for a nasty problem.  It&#039;s possible a simple &#039;skipLayout&#039; flag in onLayout() of your Coverflow  may do the trick, but after a lot of effort, the solution posted here is the best work around I&#039;ve seen yet for our case.  </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ingenious solution for a nasty problem.  It&#8217;s possible a simple &#8216;skipLayout&#8217; flag in onLayout() of your Coverflow  may do the trick, but after a lot of effort, the solution posted here is the best work around I&#8217;ve seen yet for our case. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Android Development: Database Upgrades by unwesen</title><link>http://www.unwesen.de/2009/09/07/android-development-database-upgrades/comment-page-1/#comment-2473</link> <dc:creator>unwesen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.unwesen.de/?p=336#comment-2473</guid> <description>You&#039;re right, this article was done about a rooted device, as the examples demonstrate.
The whole point was to not copy the database. If you want to copy the database, feel free. This post represents an alternative.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, this article was done about a rooted device, as the examples demonstrate.</p><p>The whole point was to not copy the database. If you want to copy the database, feel free. This post represents an alternative.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
