FOAF + Encryption

An updated SVG of the FOAF logo. I created the...
Image via Wikipedia

I’m lucky that I can count Dan Brickley and Libby Miller amongst my acquaintances. Not only did they come up with FOAF, they’re also the awesome sort of people that you can throw half-baked ideas at, and they’ll bounce back with something equally interesting1.

I’ve been spending a fair amount of time recently mulling on so-called “social media”2. There are plenty of things I dislike about “social media” for one reason or another, but there are also plenty of things I like about them.

For those not “in the know”, FOAF — which stands for friend-of-a-friend — somewhat predates the popularity of social media, but has since been overtaken by them a bit. But FOAF isn’t a website, or a service, but an RDF vocabulary that lets you create links between web pages describing people. If you’re technically inclined, the current version of the FOAF specs is here. If you’re not technically inclined, you might want to skip this post entirely.

On the other hand, if you’re very much into RDF, I should issue a different kind of warning: I’m not. While I find the concept fascinating, and see how it can be used to express pretty much any information, I don’t think it should. But that is a topic for another blog post or discussion and doesn’t belong here; suffice to warn you that I propose a rather non-RDF-y thing.

Read the rest of this entry »

  1. And possibly even related and/or helpful. []
  2. I’m sometimes tempted to call them “anti-social media”, but it’s entirely possible that’s just an artefact of me having passed my prime. []

Contradictions

I live in a strange world, that very few people I know really understand. I suppose that could be said of everyone, but that’s not my point. My point is that I regularly encounter situations in which arguments I make are considered strange. I assume that that’s because few people fully realize the extent to which my world is strange.

My world is strange in that it exists between several particular and interconnected contradictions that most people choose to ignore, for reasons I can’t criticise. I’ve chosen to exist between those contradictions, and if other people choose not to, that’s entirely up to them.

Read the rest of this entry »

John Sanbonmatsu: Metahumanism

For some reason I found myself reading a lot about humanism today, and was reminded again by how many vegans view veganism as something of an extension of humanism to encompass non-human animals. I liked that view of veganism, and, certain that someone must have thought to extend humanism in this fashion, wondered what they had called it.

After some searching and a number of wrong turns, I found that John Sanbonmatsu had coined the term “metahumanism” not too long ago to describe a very similar thing. His book The Postmodern Prince appears to be the source here, although the book is concerned more with a post-humanistic socialism.

Read the rest of this entry »

Android, Intents, Binding

After I recently stuck out my neck and all but accused Google of implementing a broken solution for code re-use, I really need to follow up on a discussion that started. I’m too cold and tired to do that today, though.

Today, I’d like to warm up to that discussion by spending some time on the meta-subject of late vs. early binding. In a way, that’s a topic for the unfinished series on programming interfaces, but that’s been unfinished for so long now that I might as well not bother with it any longer.

Read the rest of this entry »

Lawrence Lessig: It is About Time: Getting Our Values Around Copyright

Via boingboing.net.